Final answer:
The question asks about the J.D.B. v. North Carolina case, where the Supreme Court considered the role of age in police custody decisions for juveniles. The provided information, however, does not directly answer this but instead gives context on different Supreme Court decisions and constitutional amendments related to civil rights and state immunity.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the J.D.B. v. North Carolina case, the United States Supreme Court ruled on the issue of whether age should be considered when determining police custody and Miranda warnings for juveniles. However, the information provided does not directly pertain to this case specifically, but instead refers to historical Supreme Court decisions and constitutional amendments that touch upon different aspects of law and civil rights, such as the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the impact of the Eleventh Amendment on state immunity.
The additional references provided are informative but not directly related to the J.D.B. v. North Carolina case, which focused on the rights of juveniles in the context of police interrogation and the consideration of a minor's age in the Miranda custody analysis.