Final answer:
The Supreme Court decision for Roe v Wade in the first trimester established a woman's right to choose to have an abortion without significant government interference.
To change the decision, it would require a Supreme Court decision or a constitutional amendment.
Future Supreme Court nominations have the potential to impact the Roe v Wade decision based on the ideology and values of the appointed justices.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the landmark Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade in 1973, the Court ruled that a woman has the right to choose to have an abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy, up to approximately 12 weeks, without significant government interference.
This decision was based on the right to privacy protected by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. However, the Court also determined that the government has a legitimate interest in regulating abortions after the first trimester, in order to protect the potentiality of human life and the health of the woman.
Regarding changing the decision in Roe v. Wade, it would require either a Supreme Court decision to overturn it or a constitutional amendment passed by Congress and ratified by the states. The Supreme Court has the power to revisit and potentially overturn its previous decisions, but this is a complex and highly controversial process.
Future Supreme Court nominations have the potential to impact the Roe v. Wade decision. The ideology and values of the justices appointed to the Court can influence their interpretation of the Constitution and their stance on abortion rights.
If justices who are more inclined to restrict or overturn the decision are appointed, it could potentially lead to changes in the Court's stance on abortion rights and the interpretation of the Constitution in relation to this issue.