Question

Which of the following is not true of the impact of car ownership on life in Los Angeles in the 1920s?

Answer 1

Car ownership in Los Angeles in the 1920s did not lead to decreased traffic congestion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Increased Mobility: Car ownership in 1920s Los Angeles revolutionized mobility, allowing people to travel farther and more conveniently.

Urban Sprawl: The availability of cars contributed to urban sprawl as people could live farther from city centers, leading to the expansion of suburban areas.

Economic Growth: The automotive industry fueled economic growth and job opportunities, influencing the city's economic landscape.

Traffic Congestion: However, contrary to popular belief, car ownership didn't decrease traffic congestion in Los Angeles. Instead, it exacerbated the issue. The growing number of vehicles led to increased traffic on roads and highways, laying the foundation for the city's notorious traffic congestion issues, a trend that persisted and intensified over time.

Among the options, the idea that car ownership reduced traffic congestion in 1920s Los Angeles is not true. The proliferation of cars actually contributed significantly to the traffic challenges that the city faced.

Answer 2

The statement "D. Public transportation saw a surge in popularity" is not true in the context of 1920s Los Angeles. The widespread adoption of cars during this period led to a decline in the use of public transportation, as individuals increasingly favored the convenience and flexibility offered by private automobiles.Thus,the correct option is D. Public transportation saw a surge in popularity.

Step-by-step explanation:

The 1920s marked a transformative period for Los Angeles as car ownership became widespread, significantly impacting various aspects of life. Increased mobility, facilitated by the automobile, played a pivotal role in suburbanization (A).

The rise of the automobile industry indeed boosted the local economy, creating jobs and fostering economic growth (B). However, the statement that public transportation saw a surge in popularity (D) is not true in this context. The dominance of cars led to a decline in the use of public transportation during this period.

The surge in car ownership contributed to the proliferation of suburbs as people could now live farther from the city center and commute to work by car. This suburbanization trend reshaped the urban landscape, leading to the development of suburban communities. The automobile industry's growth also had a positive economic impact, creating jobs and generating income for the local economy.

Conversely, the popularity of cars had a detrimental effect on public transportation. As more people opted for private automobiles, there was a decline in the use of buses and trains. The shift towards individual car ownership contributed to traffic congestion (C) as the road infrastructure struggled to accommodate the increasing number of vehicles.

This decline in public transportation ridership was a consequence of the newfound convenience and flexibility that cars provided, ultimately diminishing the demand for traditional transit options.

Thus,the correct option is d.

Complete Question:

How did car ownership impact life in Los Angeles in the 1920s, and which of the following statements is not true in this context?

A. Increased mobility led to suburbanization.

B. The rise of the automobile industry boosted the local economy.

C. Traffic congestion became a significant issue.

D. Public transportation saw a surge in popularity.