Final answer:
Clinical reasoning concerning 'what should be done for the client' involves clinical decision-making based on evidence-based medicine and critical thinking about diagnoses and treatments. It also includes reflecting on healthcare dynamics and practices to improve patient care and professional well-being.
Step-by-step explanation:
The element of clinical reasoning that focuses on what should be done for the client relates to clinical decision-making. In this context, healthcare providers must consider possible diagnoses, as well as what additional tests might be necessary. They must use evidence-based medicine to determine the most appropriate tests and treatments. Once an initial assessment is made, they may pose questions such as: Based on these results, do you have a preliminary diagnosis? What is a recommended treatment based on this preliminary diagnosis? These critical thinking questions are designed to advance the provider's understanding and application of medical knowledge to the care of the patient.
Clinical reasoning can also involve reflecting on the broader implications of healthcare delivery. For instance, professionals may consider questions regarding the dynamics between doctors and nurses, the complexity of medical problems, and the proposed solutions, or the implications of their schedules on patient care and professional well-being. References such as Rogers (1951) and Sackett & Rosenberg (1995) offer foundational perspectives on client-centered care and the necessity of evidence-based practice, respectively, both of which are crucial elements of clinical reasoning.