199k views
0 votes
A student solves the following equation for all possible values of x: 8 Over x + 2 =2 Over x minus 4

His solution is as follows:
Step 1: 8(x – 4) = 2(x + 2)
Step 2: 4(x – 4) = (x + 2)
Step 3: 4x – 16 = x + 2
Step 4: 3x = 18
Step 5: x = 6
He determines that 6 is an extraneous solution because the difference of the numerators is 6, so the 6s cancel to 0.
Which best describes the reasonableness of the student’s solution?
His solution for x is correct and his explanation of the extraneous solution is reasonable.
His solution for x is correct, but in order for 6 to be an extraneous solution, both denominators have to result in 0 when 6 is substituted for x.
His solution for x is correct, but in order for 6 to be an extraneous solution, one denominator has to result in 0 when 6 is substituted for x.
His solution for x is incorrect. When solved correctly, there are no extraneous solutions.

User Camila
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Explanation:

The student's solution for x is correct. They correctly solved the given equation step by step and determined that x = 6.

However, their explanation for why 6 is an extraneous solution is not accurate. In order for a solution to be extraneous, it must result in a denominator being equal to zero when substituted back into the original equation. In this case, the student's explanation that the 6s cancel to 0 is incorrect.

Therefore, the correct assessment of the reasonableness of the student's solution is that their solution for x is correct, but their explanation for why 6 is an extraneous solution is not accurate.

User Tasheema
by
8.1k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.