Final answer:
To suggest an idea may not be fully accepted before a contrast, use phrases like 'Smith posits' and acknowledge limitations in your evidence. Using balanced language and qualifying statements helps engage readers constructively. Despite acknowledged limitations, further strengthen your argument by addressing and incorporating opposing viewpoints.
Step-by-step explanation:
To suggest that an idea may not be fully accepted before presenting a contrast, you might use a phrase such as 'Smith posits', followed by your contrasting statement. For example, 'Smith posits, however, the evidence presented lacks convincing support, which makes the argument less credible.' When using this structure, it's essential to provide an opposing viewpoint or address the skepticism of your readers. To avoid ending a paragraph with a concession, which could undermine your argument, you must incorporate this concession and then strengthen your claim with further evidence or reasoning.
When discussing controversial or not well-supported claims, it's important to avoid polarizing the conversation. Phrases such as 'it seems that', 'it appears to me that', or 'I may be wrong, but' can convey a level of uncertainty while still engaging the reader in a constructive dialogue. To pilot through the nuances of such discussions, especially when the 'rhetorical effectiveness' of your language is critical, you should aim to balance asserting your position with acknowledging the limitations of your evidence.
Lastly, when presenting an argument that is not well supported by credible evidence, it is important to recognized the deficiencies. Acknowledge them and articulate why, despite these, your argument still holds value. Using inclusive language or qualifying words such as 'possible', 'likely', 'plausible', and 'risk' can help to express concern and maintain credibility without coming across as too authoritative or dismissive of other viewpoints.