Final answer:
The Supreme Court does not allow prior restraint on speech and press as it would violate the right to freedom of expression.
Prior restraint is considered a form of censorship and should only be used in extreme circumstances. Instead, the Court allows for legal action to be taken after the speech has occurred if it is defamatory or illegal.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Supreme Court does not permit prior restraint on speech and press because it would violate the constitutional right to freedom of expression. Prior restraint refers to the government preventing someone from speaking or expressing themselves before they have the chance to do so.
The Court has established that prior restraint should only be used in the most extreme circumstances, as it is considered a form of censorship and places a heavy burden on the government to justify the restriction. Instead, the Court has ruled that civil or criminal proceedings should be pursued after the fact if the speech is defamatory or illegal.