Final answer:
If Darla is successful in her lawsuit for specific performance against Arlo, Arlo will be legally obligated to fulfill the terms of the contract they entered into.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Darla is successful in her lawsuit against Arlo for specific performance, Arlo will be legally obligated to fulfill the terms of the contract they entered into. Specific performance is a legal remedy that requires the breaching party to carry out their contractual obligations as originally agreed upon. In this case, if Darla is successful, Arlo will be required to perform the specific actions or provide the specific goods or services outlined in the contract.
For example, if the contract was for the sale of a unique piece of artwork and Arlo refused to sell it, a court could order Arlo to sell the artwork to Darla as originally agreed. In other words, Arlo would be forced to perform his obligation by selling the artwork to Darla.
It's important to note that specific performance is a remedy that is typically only available in cases where monetary compensation (such as damages) would not adequately compensate the injured party for the breach. The court will consider various factors, including the nature of the contract and the availability of the subject matter, in determining whether specific performance is an appropriate remedy.