Final answer:
Procedural decisions refer to management actions in legal cases, exemplified by the Miranda rights established in Miranda v. Arizona. Tactical decisions involve strategic choices regarding case elements, such as juror selection discussed in Batson v. Kentucky or advising on deportation risks in Padilla v. Kentucky. Both types of decisions are crucial for effective legal representation and are guided by Supreme Court precedents.
Step-by-step explanation:
Within the legal realm, attorneys must often make both tactical and procedural decisions that can significantly impact the outcome of a case. Procedural decisions typically involve actions that relate to the management of a lawsuit or criminal trial, such as filing of motions or how evidence is presented.
An example would be a decision in Miranda v. Arizona, where the Supreme Court outlined the necessity of procedural safeguards during custodial interrogations, including the right to stay silent and to have counsel present.
Tactical decisions, on the other hand, involve strategy related to the substantive aspects of a case, such as selecting jurors in a way that might be favorable to your client's position, as was discussed in cases like Batson v. Kentucky. Another tactical decision could involve advising clients on the risk of deportation following a conviction, as highlighted in Padilla v. Kentucky.
Informed procedural and tactical decisions are essential for the protection of clients' rights and the effective representation in a court of law. Decisions by the Supreme Court have a profound influence on these decisions, by establishing binding precedents that attorneys must carefully consider and follow.