Final answer:
Client termination of the lawyer-client relationship can occur if the client believes their right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment has been violated, as outlined by cases like Glasser v. United States, Strickland v. Washington, and Padilla v. Kentucky.
Step-by-step explanation:
The termination of the client-lawyer relationship in regards to client termination often relates to a situation where a client decides to end their legal representation. The Right to an Attorney is a fundamental aspect of this relationship, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution. In the landmark case Glasser v. United States, it was established that a defense attorney's conflict of interest due to simultaneous representation of co-defendants could violate this right. Furthermore, the Strickland v. Washington case set forth that defendants must prove their counsel's performance was not only deficient but also resulted in an adverse effect on the outcome.
The Padilla v. Kentucky case extended these protections, establishing that defense attorneys have a duty to inform clients about possible deportation consequences of a conviction. This can lead to clients terminating a lawyer's services if the client believes their right to adequate legal counsel has been compromised.