Final answer:
Exceptions to the general rule of decisions in law include conflicts among lower courts, decisions conflicting with precedent, and special urgent cases. Stare decisis is the principle of relying on past decisions, but new precedents can be created. The membership of the Supreme Court can also impact court interpretations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Exceptions to the general rule of decisions in law include conflicts among lower courts on the same issue, decisions conflicting with precedent, and state court decisions conflicting with federal decisions.
Exceptions to the general rule of decisions in law include conflicts among lower courts, decisions conflicting with precedent, and special urgent cases. Stare decisis is the principle of relying on past decisions, but new precedents can be created. The membership of the Supreme Court can also impact court interpretations.
Additionally, the Supreme Court may fast-track a case with special urgency. Stare decisis is the principle by which courts rely on past decisions and their precedents when making decisions in new cases, but new precedents or rulings can still be created. The membership of the Supreme Court can also impact court interpretations over time.