Final answer:
At the Constitutional Convention, delegates indeed debated whether the new constitution should be the supreme law, reflecting the tensions between the differing views on federal power. The Convention's original purpose was to revise the Articles of Confederation, and no state constitution of that era granted women the right to vote.A is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that there was continual disagreement among the delegates at the Constitutional Convention over whether the new constitution should be considered the supreme law of the country reflects the intense debates that were indeed a part of the process.
The Constitutional Convention, which convened in 1787, was initially meant to revise the Articles of Confederation. However, the outcome was a completely new constitution that established a strong federal government. This new Constitution was to be the supreme law of the land, a point that was hotly debated as delegates differed in their vision for the role of federal power. Antifederalists and Federalists argued vehemently over ratification, with the former group opposing the strong central government proposed by the Constitution and the latter group supporting it.
Regarding the information provided, the statement that the Constitutional Convention met in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation is true. States did indeed choose to create republics during the Revolutionary War instead of other forms of government, which also makes the relevant statement true.
The idea that Pennsylvania adopted one of the most conservative constitutions of the Revolutionary Era is false; it adopted one of the most radical. As for the necessary and proper clause, it has had the effect of expanding, not limiting, the power of the national government, which makes that statement false. Lastly, no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women to vote, so this assertion is true, and the mentioned correct option in the final answer is also true.