Final answer:
The relationship between business and community is one of mutual dependence, contrary to the assertion that business is not dependent on the community, which is false. Likewise, proprietary colony proprietors had more responsibilities than simply collecting profits, making the statement false. Dillon's Rule limits local government power, falsifying the notion that it provides autonomy.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the community relies heavily on business, but business is not mutually dependent on the community, is false. Businesses and communities are interdependent. Communities provide businesses with essential resources, such as labor and local markets, while businesses contribute to the community's economy and social fabric.
For example, local businesses often sponsor events, contribute to local charities, and provide services that are essential to the community's well-being. In proprietary colonies, it is also false that proprietors have no responsibilities except to collect profits.
Proprietors had obligations such as defending the colony, administering justice, and enacting laws. As for eighteenth-century North American colonists being self-sufficient, this is false; they did rely on imported consumer goods, particularly from Britain.
Regarding Dillon's Rule, it actually limits local government autonomy by stating that any powers not explicitly granted to local governments by the state are assumed to be withheld. Therefore, the notion that it gives local governments freedom and flexibility is false.
The market revolution did indeed bring significant social and economic changes to the United States, making that statement true. Similarly, the middle class during the period of separate spheres did distinguish themselves from the working class through various cultural and social means, making that notion true.
Lastly, cotton was indeed a strong economic foundation for the South during the Reconstruction era, so that statement is true. Moreover, the colonists' objection was not to the principle of taxation but to how tax money was applied, making that statement true.