Final answer:
The flaw in the finite godist view of morality is that without a definitive source, morality may become arbitrary, with no objective standard to resolve ethical conflicts or establish universal codes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Exploring the Flaw in Finite Godist Beliefs About Morality .According to finite godists, the source of morality is uncertain, which suggests that humans are responsible for determining right from wrong. The flaw in this belief lies in the assumption that in the absence of absolute knowledge of a moral source, human beings can independently devise a universally acceptable and consistent moral system. However, this contradicts several philosophical problems, such as the Euthyphro dilemma, natural foundations of morality, and the implications of Divine Command Theory.
The Euthyphro Dilemma and Divine Command Theory .The Euthyphro Dilemma presents the dichotomy of whether moral goods are commanded by God because they are inherently good, or are they good solely because God commands them? This leads to questions about the arbitrariness of morality and whether a divine being could objectively define it. The Divine Command Theory, which posits that moral values are based on God's will, faces the issue that if morals can be changed by divine command, then morality itself might be seen as inherently unstable or arbitrary.
Human Understanding and Morality From a philosophical standpoint, determining morality from a human perspective involves normative claims that are challenging to prove. For instance, David Hume's skepticism about deriving ought from is posits that facts cannot substantiate moral claims. Moreover, if humans can discern right from wrong without divine input, the necessity of a higher power for moral guidance becomes questionable.
While finite godists may argue for a human-centered approach to morality, the lack of an objective standard may lead to a fragmented moral landscape, making it difficult to adjudicate ethical disputes or to align on universal moral laws. Thus, the flaw in the finite godist view may be seen in the struggle to find a concrete foundation for moral judgments in the absence of a known divine source.