Final answer:
The correct answer is D. Parody profiles and indecent photographs. Willard argues that there are three categories that should guide in assessing the content of online student speech: outrageous or inherently disruptive speech, focused or targeted offensive speech, and general school-related speech.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct answer is D. Parody profiles and indecent photographs.
Willard argues that there are three categories that should guide in assessing the content of online student speech. These categories are:
- Outrageous or Inherently Disruptive Speech: This refers to speech that is intentionally designed to disrupt or cause harm, such as threats or harassment.
- Focused or Targeted Offensive Speech: This includes speech that is targeted at specific individuals or groups in a derogatory or offensive manner.
- General School-Related Speech: This encompasses speech that is related to school activities or issues, such as discussions about coursework or extracurricular activities.
Parody profiles and indecent photographs do not fall into any of these categories, therefore, option D is not one of the three categories argued by Willard.