Final answer:
Lifetime terms of office for judges and justices in the federal court system have both positive and negative aspects. They provide judicial independence but can lead to judges staying in office even when they are no longer effective. The framers chose lifetime terms to ensure judicial independence and stability.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lifetime terms of office for judges and justices in the federal court system have both positive and negative aspects. One positive aspect is that it provides judicial independence. Since judges do not have to worry about being reelected or reappointed, they are free to make decisions based solely on the law and the Constitution, without fear of political repercussions. This helps protect the Constitution as judges can make decisions that may be unpopular but are necessary to uphold the principles of the Constitution.
On the other hand, a negative aspect of lifetime terms is that it can lead to judges staying in office even when they are no longer capable or effective. Since there is no term limit, a judge can remain in office for many years, potentially becoming out of touch with current societal and legal developments. This can hinder the ability of the court to adapt and evolve with the changing needs of society.
The framers of the Constitution chose lifetime terms for judges to ensure the independence of the judiciary and to provide stability in the interpretation and application of the law. By giving judges lifetime appointments, they are free from the pressures of politics and can make decisions based on their understanding of the law and the Constitution rather than external influences or the desire for reelection.