Final answer:
Laws created by representatives elected by factions often cater to the specific interests of those factions, potentially neglecting the broader public good. Gerrymandering can exacerbate this issue by creating safe districts that encourage polarization and reduce the need for political compromises.
Step-by-step explanation:
Laws resulting from representatives elected by factions may prioritize the interests of those factions, potentially leading to legislation that serves particular groups rather than the general public. For example, a representative elected by a faction with financial interests in oil drilling might push laws that favor drilling at the expense of environmental concerns. In political systems with gerrymandered districts, representatives from extreme factions are more likely to get elected, which can lead to polarization and an unwillingness to compromise, resulting in legislative stagnation. Legislators also face a balancing act between adhering to their party's agenda and serving their constituents' interests. Additionally, the increasing sophistication of gerrymandering may further polarize politics by creating safe districts for certain politicians, giving them less incentive to appeal to a broader constituency.