Question

What was the result in the case in the book Snell v. Suffolk County, in which Hispanic and Black correction officers sued for hostile work environment harassment?

a. The corrections officers demonstrated that a hostile work environment existed by proving that workers had been subjected to continuing verbal abuse and racial harassment by co-workers and that the county sheriff's department had done nothing to prevent the abuse.

b. The court determined that there was no hostile work environment because the prisoners and co-workers laughed along with the jokes.

c. The facilities employees failed to produce evidence that was necessary to constitute a hostile work environment.

d. The court indicated that hostile work environment claim was reserved for only sexual harassment claims.

e. The court determined that if Congress wanted race and religion to be a part of a hostile work environment claim that Congress or the EEOC had to make changes to Title VII.

Answer 1

In Snell v. Suffolk County, Hispanic and Black correction officers successfully proved a hostile work environment existed due to ongoing racial harassment, and the county sheriff's department's inaction. The correct option is a.

Step-by-step explanation:

The result in the case described in the book Snell v. Suffolk County, where Hispanic and Black correction officers sued for hostile work environment harassment, aligned with option (a).

The correction officers were successful in demonstrating that a hostile work environment existed, proving they had been subjected to ongoing verbal abuse and racial harassment by co-workers and that the county sheriff's department failed to take action to prevent this abuse.

This case illustrates the principle that harassment in the workplace is not limited to sexual harassment but can also be based on race, national origin, religion, or age, all of which are protected classes under statutes regulated by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

The correct option is a. The corrections officers demonstrated that a hostile work environment existed by proving that workers had been subjected to continuing verbal abuse and racial harassment by co-workers and that the county sheriff's department had done nothing to prevent the abuse.