Final answer:
The answer to the student's question is option c, which states that laws constrain the judiciary because decisions must be made based on applicable laws. Courts deal with both criminal and civil cases and operate within the existing legal framework, setting precedents that other judges and courts may follow.
Step-by-step explanation:
The main answer to the student's question regarding the laws of a case is option c. Laws constrain the judiciary because court decisions must be based on applicable laws. This Menasha judges and courts are required to make decisions within the framework of existing legal statutes and precedents. Courts cannot simply decide cases based on their own preferences; they must adhere to the rule of law, which includes statutory law and case law. This ensures a level of consistency and predictability in the legal system, allowing individuals and entities to understand their rights and obligations under the law.Moreover, courts deal with both criminal and civil disputes, and laws apply across both of these domains. Criminal law involves governmental establishment of rules and penalties for prohibited conduct that could harm others, while civil law typically deals with disputes between private parties. Judges may make law through their interpretations and set precedents which subsequent courts follow, in a system known as common law or case law.In conclusion, it is important to understand that court decisions are not made in isolation but are deeply rooted in the established legal framework, ensuring fair and consistent administration of justice. Judges play a critical role in this process by interpreting laws and applying them to individual cases.