Final answer:
e. All of the answers are correct. Congress has several options to respond to a Supreme Court ruling on a federal statute, including rewriting the statute, expressing displeasure, modifying the Court's appellate jurisdiction, and amending the Constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Congress disagreed with a Supreme Court ruling on a federal statute, it could possibly: a) rewrite the statute, b) express its displeasure with the ruling, c) modify the scope of the Court's appellate jurisdiction, d) amend the Constitution, e) All of the answers are correct. This question is exploring the various checks and balances that exist between the legislative branch and the judiciary.
Congress has several mechanisms to respond to a Supreme Court decision. For instance, if a law is ruled unconstitutional, Congress can rewrite the legislation to bring it into compliance with the constitutional framework as interpreted by the Court. Additionally, the legislative branch can express its disapproval formally or informally, though this has no legal force. Further, Congress has the authority to define and modify the appellate jurisdiction of the federal courts, a power that could potentially limit the types of cases the Supreme Court may hear. Lastly, amending the Constitution is a more direct and far-reaching way to override a Supreme Court decision; however, this process is complex and requires a supermajority in both the Senate and the House, as well as ratification by the states.