Question

According to the doctrine of judicial restraint, the judiciary should

a. defer to the decisions of elected officials.
b. deny most appeals for retrials.
c. deny individual rights when they conflict with the majority's desires.
d. decline to make any decision that requires judges to give added meaning to the words of the Constitution.
e. conform to the will of the people as measured by public opinion polls.

Answer 1

Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit their power and defer to elected officials. It advocates for upholding established precedent and only striking down laws that are clearly unconstitutional.

Step-by-step explanation:

Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional. This philosophy advocates for the courts to defer to the decisions of elected officials and to respect established precedent. Judicial restraint is often associated with a strict constructionist approach to interpreting the Constitution.