Final answer:
The statement is false. Traditional Chinese characters and pinyin engage different cognitive and neurobiological processes given that characters are ideographic and pinyin is phonetic, affecting different areas of the brain during reading.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that neural activity would be the same when Chinese speakers read in both traditional Chinese characters and pinyin is false. Traditional Chinese characters are ideographic, meaning they represent ideas or objects rather than sounds.
Each character carries its own meaning and must be learned individually. Conversely, pinyin is a phonetic system that approximates the sounds of Mandarin using the Roman alphabet and tone indicators. This represents a fundamental difference in the cognitive processing required for literacy in these two systems. Learning traditional characters is a matter of memorizing thousands of unique symbols along with their meanings, which is a more visual and object-recognition intensive process.
In contrast, pinyin leverages the reader's knowledge of the phonetic values assigned to each letter of the Roman alphabet, a system that is more auditory and phonologically based. As such, reading traditional Chinese characters would predominantly activate areas of the brain related to visual processing and memory recall, while reading pinyin would engage areas related to phonological processing and auditory recognition.