Question

How might someone who unknowingly is committing the fundamental attribution error explain Stanley Milgram's obedience study?

a) They would attribute the behavior to the situation rather than the disposition of the participants.
b) They would blame the experimenter for coercing the participants.
c) They would consider the participants as naturally obedient individuals.
d) They would assume the participants were acting out of fear.

Answer 1

Someone who unknowingly is committing the fundamental attribution error may explain Stanley Milgram's obedience study by attributing the behavior to the situational factors rather than the personal disposition of the participants.

Step-by-step explanation:

Someone who unknowingly is committing the fundamental attribution error may explain Stanley Milgram's obedience study by attributing the behavior to the situation rather than the disposition of the participants. They may argue that the participants were simply following orders from an authority figure, and the study was designed to test people's willingness to obey commands. This explanation would focus on the situational factors that influenced the participants' behavior, rather than their personal traits or characteristics.