Final answer:
A response should include Fernando’s argument, new information, the connection between the new information and Fernando’s argument, and any adjustments to the argument based on this new information. Facts, inferences, and opinions are core to argumentative writing, and addressing counterarguments is essential for credibility. B is the correct option.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which elements a response should include after considering the new information related to an argument being constructed. A complete response should incorporate the following: A. Fernando’s argument—the initial argument or claim he is making; B. New information—additional facts or data that may have a bearing on the argument; C. How the new information relates to Fernando’s argument—exploring the connection between the new data and the original claim; and D. Adjustments Fernando should make based on the new information—any modifications or revisions to the original argument necessitated by the latest findings.
When crafting an argumentative text, it is imperative to differentiate between verifiable facts, reasonable inferences, and personal opinions. Facts are the backbone of a solid argument, while inferences link these facts to overarching points or themes. It is equally crucial in argumentative writing to acknowledge and address counterarguments. The ability to confront and counter these opposing views can greatly enhance the credibility and persuasiveness of the argument.
Revisions based on peer feedback play a critical role in formulating a more robust argument. The process of revision may involve refining the thesis statement, enhancing the development of paragraphs, or improving the overall structure and flow of the text, including the acknowledgment of counterclaims and their treatment within the argument.