Final answer:
The incremental analysis shows that Option 1 for the Lees' production space will cost $600 more per year than Option 2. The Yoga Center example demonstrates the decision-making process when operating costs and revenues are compared to determine the viability of continuing business.
Step-by-step explanation:
The incremental analysis involves comparing the additional costs of Option 1 over Option 2 for the Lees' production space requirements.
For Option 1, the additional annual cost for rent and utilities would be rent of $1200 per month plus utilities of $350 per month.
For Option 2, the costs are a rent of $1350 per month and utilities of $150 per month. Over a year, Option 1 equates to an annual cost of $18,600 (($1200 + $350) x 12 months), while Option 2 equates to $18,000 (($1350 + $150) x 12 months). Therefore, the incremental cost of choosing Option 1 over Option 2 is $600 per year.
Looking at the Yoga Center's situation as an example, if the center decides to operate, the expenses including variable costs and fixed costs must be covered by the realized revenue to avoid losses.
When the Yoga Center earns revenues of $20,000 with variable costs of $15,000, it covers more than the variable costs and contributes to fixed costs, hence, should continue in business.