126k views
1 vote
How did the battle of verdun and the battle of the somme symbolize modern war’s destructiveness?

a. the allies suffered huge losses but benefited significantly from both battles.
b. neither battle ended the war as the allies and germany had expected them to.
c. both battles caused many deaths but achieved very little or no progress for either side.
d. germany made real gains in both battles that were offset by the number of troops lost.

User Cipi
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The Battle of Verdun and the Battle of the Somme were emblematic of modern war's destructiveness, causing immense casualties with negligible strategic gains for either side. The correct answer to how these battles symbolized modern war's destructiveness is 'C - both battles caused many deaths but achieved very little or no progress for either side.' These conflicts signified the futility of trench warfare in a period characterized by devastatingly powerful defensive technologies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Symbolism of Modern War's Destructiveness in the Battles of Verdun and the Somme

The Battle of Verdun and the Battle of the Somme epitomize the destructive nature of modern warfare, where massive casualties were suffered yet little strategic gain was achieved. In the context of World War I, these battles represented a new scale of warfare, marked by the use of advanced technology such as machine guns, artillery, and poison gas. At Verdun, both French and German forces incurred over 900,000 casualties combined, and despite the initial German capture of the city, it led to no significant advantage as counterattacks nullified their gains. Similarly, the Battle of the Somme also resulted in severe losses amounting to around a million casualties for a minimal territorial advance of just six miles.

C - both battles caused many deaths but achieved very little or no progress for either side - is therefore the correct option as it accurately captures the limited progress in conjunction with the enormous human cost. The battles didn’t end the war, and no definitive strategic benefit was obtained by either side, ultimately symbolizing the futility and horror of trench warfare that prevailed during this era. This extreme cost is what made these battles powerful symbols of the destructiveness of modern war, which ultimately did not resolve international tensions but instead heightened them.

Modern warfare, marked by the introduction of new military technologies and the concept of trench warfare, led to prolonged conflicts characterized by staggering numbers of casualties. Despite novel strategies and the deployment of enormous forces, the nature of these battles demonstrated that the power of defense had grown significantly, often leading to a bloody stalemate rather than swift and decisive victories of past conflicts. With no side able to assert dominance, the nature of conflict itself had transformed, shattering previous notions of war's glory and heroism.

User Werner Altewischer
by
7.3k points