Final answer:
Teresa's false dilemma argument is supported by the claim that without responsibilities, kids won't manage their time well. The importance of balanced responsibilities, play, and consideration of socioeconomic factors is crucial in a child's development.
Step-by-step explanation:
The evidence Teresa uses to support the false dilemma in the excerpt is that "kids without responsibilities will not schedule their time wisely." This presents a false choice between strict discipline and disorganization, suggesting that without responsibilities, children cannot learn to manage their time effectively. The other statements listed describe the benefits of responsibility and are not used to support the false dilemma.
Regarding the removal of recess for better standardized test performance and using its loss as punishment, many argue that it is counterproductive. Recess and unstructured play are essential for social development and well-being, allowing children to relieve stress and improve concentration. Over-controlling parenting can stifle a child's sense of initiative, as Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development proposes that during the preschool stage, children should resolve the task of initiative versus guilt by asserting control over their world. Parents who are too controlling can cause their children to feel guilty for their independence, leading to issues in confidence and purpose.
Similarly, children from different socioeconomic backgrounds face various challenges that impact their academic achievement and personal development. Working-class students may have to juggle multiple responsibilities, such as working part-time jobs or caring for siblings, limiting their ability to succeed academically. The education system often doesn't account for these disparities, potentially furthering the divide between social classes.