Final answer:
To question an article concluding that climate change is not real, one should evaluate if the conclusion uses verifiable facts and good sources, compare it with the consensus among climate scientists, and consider the potential biases or motivations behind the article. Option c is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you encountered an article arguing that climate change was not real, the most effective way to question the conclusion of the article would be to ask whether the conclusion uses verifiable facts and good sources. This approach is focused on evaluating the evidence presented in the article and its scientific validity. Confirming the reliability of sources and the accuracy of facts can help one assess the credibility of the arguments made against climate change.
It is also beneficial to consider if the conclusion agrees with the broader consensus in the scientific community. This involves comparing the article's claims with the prevailing scientific evidence and understanding presented by climate scientists, who overwhelmingly support the reality of anthropogenic climate change. Considering the overwhelming majority of peer-reviewed climate articles that affirm global warming, positions that reject climate change should be scrutinized for potential biases or incomplete assessments of data.
Lastly, understanding how to differentiate between fact and opinion, how data can be selectively presented, and the economic or political motivations behind climate change denial, can provide deeper insights when examining such articles. Keeping in mind the scientific consensus and the evidence supporting the realities of climate change is essential when questioning alternative conclusions presented by skeptical sources.