Final answer:
Scientists analyze experiment data to see if it supports or disproves a hypothesis. Supported hypotheses may lead to further scientific inquiry, while those that are disproved lead to alternative hypotheses. Repeated supportive evidence increases the acceptance of a hypothesis. Therefore , the correct answer options is b)
Step-by-step explanation:
Scientists use data from experiments to evaluate a hypothesis and draw a conclusion. They analyze the results through statistical, mathematical, and graphical methods to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or disproved.
If the hypothesis is supported by the evidence, it may lead to further testing of related hypotheses. Conversely, if the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, scientists must discard it and explore alternative explanations. The process of hypothesis testing is a core part of the scientific method and helps in building a valuable body of knowledge.
It is important to note that even when a hypothesis is supported, it is not conclusively proven to be true, as future evidence could potentially disprove it. Multiple experiments providing supporting evidence strengthen the likelihood that a hypothesis is a useful description of nature. Thus, evidence that aligns with the hypothesis predictions tends to make the hypothesis more accepted among the scientific community.