163k views
1 vote
Compare effigy mounds and nazca lines. what is one thing that makes these artforms different from one another?

a. the four most common shapes for nazca lines were bears, birds, panthers, and turtles.
b. the nazca lines were created by removing the top layer of reddish pebbles to show a whiter ground beneath.
c. effigy mounds were mainly in the shapes of spiders, monkeys, sharks, lizards, and birds.
d. effigy mounds were in the desert, so they were not affected by a lot of wind or rain.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The Nazca Lines and Effigy Mounds differ primarily in their creation; the Nazca Lines involved removing pebbles to reveal the ground beneath, unlike the earth-built Effigy Mounds.

Step-by-step explanation:

When comparing Effigy Mounds and the Nazca Lines, one significant difference is the way they were created and their geographic location. Option B states that the Nazca lines were created by removing the top layer of reddish pebbles to reveal a white ground beneath. This is a fact that distinguishes them from Effigy Mounds. Nazca Lines are found in the coastal plains of Peru and include a variety of animal figures such as birds, fish, lizards, and cats, many of which are best viewed from the air due to their immense scale. In contrast, Effigy Mounds are earthen mounds found in North America, shaped like animals and often serving as burial sites. They were constructed with less labor and typically in less time than other mound structures.

The correct answer to the question would be option B: The Nazca Lines were created by removing the top layer of reddish pebbles to show a whiter ground beneath. This method is distinct from the construction of Effigy Mounds, which were made from earth and did not involve revealing a different-colored ground beneath.

User Milind Bankar
by
8.3k points