Answer: (Not my opinion) "Should public schools require mandatory drug testing for students? This issue has become more prevalent in recent years as concerns over drug use among teenagers continue to grow. Proponents argue that mandatory drug testing acts as a deterrent and helps identify students in need of support or treatment. However, opponents contend that such testing policies infringe on civil liberties and privacy rights. They also point out that research on the efficacy of school drug testing programs has been inconclusive. This paper argues that while concerns over teenage drug abuse are valid, mandatory drug testing in schools does more harm than good by damaging the trust between students and educators and by reinforcing problematic biases. Instead, schools should respond to this issue through comprehensive educational programs and voluntary counseling options."
Step-by-step explanation:
Some key features that make this an effective argumentative essay introduction:
Clearly states the issue and the two sides of the argument
Provides context about why this issue matters currently
Briefly outlines the position the paper will take
Mentions a couple of the reasons to support the argument
Specifies that counterarguments will be addressed
Is concise while covering the key elements
The introduction foreshadows a paper that will argue against mandatory school drug testing programs in a balanced and researched way.