Final answer:
Ignoring complaints when responding to criticism about legal logging activities in national forests is not the best strategy. A more effective approach includes engaging with the public, prioritizing sustainable practices, and promoting reduced-impact logging techniques to minimize the ecological impact. The correct option is a. true
Step-by-step explanation:
The best strategy to respond to criticism from environmentalists and tourists regarding legal but unpopular logging activities in national forests is not to simply ignore the complaints or public views.
While creating an aggressive ad campaign emphasizing the jobs and economic benefits might seem tempting, such a strategy could potentially backfire by worsening public relations and ignoring legitimate concerns about sustainability and ecological impacts.
Instead, engaging in open dialogue, demonstrating commitment to sustainable logging practices, and working with conservation groups to ensure that the impact on forest ecosystems is minimized, could be more beneficial in the long-term.
Examples from history, such as the Timber Wars in the Pacific Northwest, suggest that ignoring the concerns of environmentalists and the public can lead to intense conflicts and unsatisfactory outcomes for all parties involved.
In addition, advertising campaigns that highlight the implementation of Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) techniques and the company's efforts in preserving habitat and biodiversity can contribute to a more positive image and possibly mitigate some of the unpopular opinions towards logging operations. The correct option is a. true