The writer skillfully strengthens their argument against love locks on Parisian bridges by using different rhetorical tactics in paragraphs 7 and 14.
How to explain
In paragraph 7, they rely on logic, presenting stats about the damage caused by these locks. This aims to make readers see the practical need to limit this tradition.
On the other hand, in paragraph 14, the writer appeals emotionally by sharing Lisa Anselmo's view as a local resident, stirring feelings of empathy and concern for the city's long-term welfare.
By combining logical evidence with emotional resonance, the argument becomes more persuasive, urging for a ban on love locks in Paris.
Complete Question:
How does the author utilize rhetoric techniques in paragraphs 7 and 14 to further their objective regarding the love locks?
Text:
In paragraphs 7 and 14, the author employs distinct rhetorical strategies to advocate for the restriction of love locks on Parisian bridges. Paragraph 7 presents data and statistics showcasing the detrimental structural impacts of the love locks, emphasizing the necessity of limiting this tradition.
Conversely, in paragraph 14, the author employs an emotional appeal through Lisa Anselmo, a Parisian resident, who highlights the enduring effects on the city of Paris. Anselmo's sentiments evoke empathy, emphasizing the city's preservation and arguing for a ban on love locks due to their lasting consequences.