Final answer:
The old perception of Progressivism was regressive, ineffective, embraced by conservatives, and a foreign ideology. However, the new perception is that Progressivism was actually progressive, brought positive change, was a liberal movement, and American-born. Option a) is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The traditional viewpoint on Progressivism depicted it as a regressive and ineffectual movement, often associated with conservatives and considered a foreign ideology. This outdated perception suggested a lack of appreciation for its efficacy and positioned it as an unconventional and potentially counterproductive force. However, a contemporary reevaluation has emerged, challenging these antiquated notions and offering a more nuanced understanding.
In this revised perspective, Progressivism is recognized as a genuinely progressive force that ushered in positive changes. Contrary to its former portrayal as a conservative ideology, it is now acknowledged as a liberal movement, aligning with principles of reform and societal improvement. Importantly, the perception of Progressivism as a foreign import has been replaced with an understanding of its distinctly American origins, highlighting its deep roots in the national narrative.
This paradigm shift underscores the evolving nature of historical interpretations, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced understanding of movements like Progressivism. By acknowledging its progressive impact, liberal underpinnings, and native roots, the revised perspective offers a more accurate portrayal of Progressivism as a dynamic force that shaped the course of American history.