Final answer:
Compromising does emphasize workable, optimal decisions and solutions to conflict, making the statement True. It is an essential aspect of collective decision-making when parties agree on goals but differ in details, as demonstrated by historical and environmental negotiation examples.
Step-by-step explanation:
Compromising indeed emphasizes workable, optimal decisions and solutions to conflict, making the statement True. Compromise requires an understanding of gray areas and the ability to find points of connection or overlap between differing positions. For instance, the Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached during the formation of the United States Constitution that dealt with the issues of representation and taxation, reflecting how compromise works to resolve conflict by providing both sides with some satisfaction of their demands.
In collective decision-making, compromise is likely to occur when all parties involved generally agree on the goals but have differences in the details. As an example, if countries are negotiating on greenhouse gas emissions, and they all aim to reduce emissions but differ in the extent to which they are willing to commit, a compromise is likely to be the method through which a collective decision is reached.