28.7k views
2 votes
Can you describe the evaluative criteria for judging the value of policy proposals or alternatives?

User Obenjiro
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Evaluative criteria for judging policy proposals involve assessing effectiveness, feasibility, ethics, cost, and impact.

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluative criteria for judging the value of policy proposals or alternatives can vary depending on the subject, audience, and purpose of the evaluation. Some common evaluative criteria include:

  • Effectiveness: Assessing the extent to which a policy proposal or alternative achieves its intended goals or solves a problem.
  • Feasibility: Considering the practicality and likelihood of implementing a policy proposal or alternative.
  • Ethics: Evaluating the moral implications and adherence to ethical standards of a policy proposal or alternative.
  • Cost: Examining the financial implications and affordability of a policy proposal or alternative.
  • Impact: Analyzing the potential positive or negative effects on individuals, communities, and society as a whole.

These evaluative criteria help stakeholders make informed decisions and prioritize policy proposals or alternatives based on their value and potential impact.

User Lorilee
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.