Final answer:
Needle exchange programs are an example of harm reduction strategy opposed by some, who argue that it enables drug use and doesn't address addiction, possibly increasing public safety issues. However, evidence shows they reduce HIV transmission effectively without promoting increased drug use.
Step-by-step explanation:
One example of a harm reduction strategy that some people believe should not be used is needle exchange programs. The rationale behind this opposition is often based on the concern that providing clean needles may appear to condone or enable drug use rather than discouraging it.
However, the primary goal of needle exchange programs is to reduce the spread of blood-borne diseases such as HIV/AIDS, which can be transmitted through the sharing of contaminated needles by intravenous drug users.
Opponents argue that such programs do not address the underlying addiction and may prevent drug users from seeking treatment by providing a means to continue their drug use safely.
Additionally, some believe that these programs may lead to an increase in drug-related crime and public safety issues. Despite these concerns, research has shown that needle exchange programs can significantly reduce the rates of HIV transmission without increasing drug use, and they are considered a cost-effective public health intervention.