Final answer:
The timeliness of the owner's suit against architect Mike Brady in 2013 for the negligent design of a building depends on the jurisdiction's statute of limitations for breach of contract and negligence, and possibly the statute of repose specific to construction
Step-by-step explanation:
When determining whether the owner's suit against architect Mike Brady for the cost of restoring the building would be timely if brought in 2013, it's important to consider the statute of limitations for breach of contract as well as for negligence claims in the jurisdiction where the suit is being filed.
Typically, the statute of limitations begins to run at the time the breach occurs or when the damage is discovered or should have been discovered through diligence.
In many jurisdictions, the statute of limitations for contract claims can range from 3 to 6 years and for negligence claims can be somewhat similar. However, there are also special construction laws such as the statute of repose which may apply, which can limit the time frame in which a suit can be brought following the completion of construction, often 10 to 12 years.
Without knowing the specific jurisdiction's laws, it's not possible to determine definitively whether the suit would be timely.