75,671 views
10 votes
10 votes
HELP PLS FAST

Read the passage and then answer the question that follows.

When Mike adjusted his bicycle, I thought I was watching a chess game. He would stare at a part for a while before he acted. Then we would wait for his opponent's response. For example, he stared for ten minutes before tightening the rear sprockets. Then he rode the bike for a minute, analyzing the change in the bike's performance. At first, I thought he was too careful. Now, I realize he didn't want the bicycle to become his Waterloo.

Which is a true statement about the passage?

1.It contains technical language but no analogy or allusion.
2.It contains an analogy, an allusion, and technical language.
3.It contains an analogy and technical language but no allusion.
4.It contains an allusion and technical language but no analogy.

User Ahmed Salem
by
3.0k points

2 Answers

8 votes
8 votes

Answer:

It contains and analogy, an allusion, and technical language.

Step-by-step explanation:

The analogy is comparing watching Mike adjust the bicycle to a chess game. There is an allusion to Waterloo. There is technical language specifically discussing when Mike adjusted the sproket of the bike.

User Qamnott
by
3.2k points
6 votes
6 votes

Answer:

2. it contains an analogy, an allusion and technical language.

User Kett
by
3.6k points