Final answer:
It is false that compensating employees with stock is illegal; many companies use stock compensation. Sharecroppers did pay rent with crop shares, no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women to vote, proprietors had responsibilities beyond collecting profits, and the market revolution did bring significant changes to the U.S.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is false that it is illegal to compensate employees by granting them shares of stock. In fact, many companies offer stock options or grants as part of their compensation packages. These plans can align the interests of employees with those of shareholders, possibly enhancing the company's performance by incentivizing employees to perform to the best of their abilities.
As for the historical aspects presented in the questions, sharecroppers were indeed tenant farmers who paid their rent with shares of their crops, making this statement true. Sharecropping was a common practice in the post-Civil War Southern United States and became a defining element of the agricultural economy in that region.
Concerning women's suffrage in the Revolutionary Era, it is true that no state constitution allowed women the right to vote during that time. The right to vote for women, also known as women's suffrage, was not achieved until much later, with the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920.
In the case of proprietary colonies, it is false that the proprietors had no responsibilities except to collect profits. Proprietors had numerous duties which included managing the colony's affairs and ensuring its success and sustainability. And finally, the market revolution indeed brought many social and economic changes to the United States, making this statement true.