Final answer:
The incorrect statement among the options provided is "a. Stakeholder involvement is not essential for CRC success," as stakeholder involvement is indeed crucial for the success of the CRC process, echoing the collaborative involvement of key stakeholder Joshua Brown in a research project.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks to identify which of the given statements about Class-Responsibility-Collaborator (CRC) cards is incorrect. CRC cards are used in object-oriented programming and software engineering to help design and think about software classes. The correct answers to the options presented would be that:
- Stakeholder involvement is essential for CRC success because stakeholders provide valuable input that shapes the project requirements and design, as illustrated by Joshua Brown's eagerness to be involved in research facilitated by Dessie Clark.
- CRC is a brainstorming technique used to explore the responsibilities of classes and their collaborations with others in a software system.
- CRC analysis stands for class, responsibilities, and collaborators, which are the three main components represented on CRC cards used during the design process.
- There may be an apocryphal story used in CRC method as a pedagogical tool or to illustrate a point regarding CRC usage or principles, although its veracity could be in question.
Therefore, the incorrect statement is a. Stakeholder involvement is not essential for CRC success, which is false because stakeholder involvement is crucial for the success of a CRC session.