Final answer:
Items are deemed worthy to be on the agenda through a process that includes problem identification and framing the issue compellingly. The timing, public input, and societal impact are also crucial in setting the agenda. Some items are unavoidable, like the president's annual budget, while others may be influenced by current events and the modifications of existing proposals.
Step-by-step explanation:
Items are defined as being worthy to be put on the agenda through a process known as agenda setting, which is a critical initial phase in public policy making. This process involves problem identification, where issues that merit discussion are recognized. However, not all issues are deemed worthy as the government's attention is finite. Thus, policy advocates must frame the issue compellingly to emphasize a persuasive dimension or critical need, such as highlighting the lack of health insurance to make health care reform salient.
In addition, timing and relevance are crucial, with items needing to present a sense of urgency to capture attention. For instance, topics like the Black Lives Matter movement can be framed in a way that resonates with current events to ensure they are prioritized on the agenda. Moreover, public input and societal impact are essential factors, especially when dealing with public remembrance in public spaces. Decisions made by policy makers and leaders, like city planners and museum curators, must consider a variety of factors including historical, contextual, cultural, and artistic concerns.
Some agenda items, however, are unavoidable such as the president's annual budget proposal, which reflects significant policy choices. The president's agenda is shaped not only by the president but also through collaboration and modification of proposals that align with policy goals, often borrowing from bills introduced in Congress or proposed by the bureaucracy to build support.