Final answer:
In Florida, lightning strikes are common and thus foreseeable. This makes the act of God defense ineffective for a lightning strike injury on a soccer field, as those responsible for the event are expected to have safety protocols in place.
Step-by-step explanation:
The act of God defense in legal terms refers to an unforeseeable natural event, such as a lightning strike, that cannot be reasonably anticipated or prevented. Usually, this defense is used to shield a party from liability for injuries caused by natural events. However, in the state of Florida, the prevalence of lightning strikes is well known, and thus these events are considered foreseeable. Therefore, an act of God defense for a player injured by a lightning strike on a soccer field is not likely to be effective because it is an event that can and should be planned for by those hosting outdoor activities. Weather monitoring and having proper safety protocols in place to evacuate in the case of approaching storms are expected precautions. Failure to take such actions could lead to the conclusion that the injury was not solely caused by an act of God but was also due to the negligence of the party responsible for the safety of the players.