Final answer:
The counter arguments against the criticism of the Versailles Conference include the validity of certain provisions, Hitler's explanations, and the hopes for peace through appeasement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The counter arguments against the Versailles Conference Criticism:
1. Validity of certain provisions:
Some argued that certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty seemed excessive. They believed that these provisions, such as the war guilt clause and reparations, were too harsh and contributed to the economic instability of Germany.
2. Hitler's explanations:
World leaders who did not want to confront Hitler pointed out that some of Hitler's explanations for his actions were true. He proclaimed peaceful intentions and claimed that he was making necessary moves to rectify the perceived injustices of the treaty.
3. Hopes for peace:
Many leaders in Europe followed a program of appeasement, hoping to avoid another world war. They believed that engaging in diplomatic negotiations with Hitler and making concessions would maintain peace in the region.