178k views
1 vote
Must an employee consent to have HIV serologic testing done after an exposure incident?

A. Yes
B. No
C. Only with written consent
D. Only if symptoms are present

User Nevzatopcu
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Yes, an employee must consent to have HIV serologic testing done after an exposure incident. Consent upholds the individual's rights and adheres to legal standards.

Correct option is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Must an employee consent to have HIV serologic testing done after an exposure incident? The correct answer is A. Yes. Employees have the right to consent or refuse HIV serologic testing following a potential exposure to the virus. Consent is essential to protect the individual's rights and to comply with medical ethics and legal standards surrounding patient privacy and autonomy. In the event of an exposure incident, it is crucial for healthcare providers to follow established protocols regarding consent and confidential medical testing.

Hospitals take proactive measures to minimize liability and protect patient health, as seen in the situation where a facility contacted 1300 patients for potential HIV testing due to exposure from a hospital employee. Prompt testing and treatment can significantly impact the management and prognosis of HIV infection.

User Szkj
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.