Final Answer:
Yes, there is at least one person who gets out after A but before B. This implies the existence of an event (X) occurring between A and B in the sequence of events.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sequence of events, let A represent the event of someone getting out, and B represent the event of another person getting out. The statement indicates that there is at least one person who gets out after A but before B. This implies that between the events A and B, there exists a third event, denoted as X, where someone gets out. Therefore, the sequence can be represented as A → X → B, confirming that there is at least one person who gets out after A but before B.
In mathematical terms, if we consider a timeline where events A and B are plotted, and each event corresponds to a unique time point, the statement asserts the existence of a third time point (X) between A and B. Mathematically, this can be expressed as A < X < B, ensuring that X occurs after A and before B. The inequality signifies the temporal order of events on the timeline.
This logical interpretation aligns with the statement's requirement for at least one person to get out between A and B, providing a concise yet thorough explanation of the given scenario.