Final answer:
Jorge and Ruth are debating whether direct experience is necessary to write knowledgeably about a historical music genre, like 1960s rock music, with Ruth asserting that learned understanding is sufficient.
Step-by-step explanation:
The issue at hand between Jorge and Ruth concerns whether a person can write authoritatively about a historical period or culture without directly experiencing it. Jorge suggests that Ruth can't effectively write about 1960s rock music because she was not part of the demographic that primarily created and consumed it at the time—being teens and young adults of that era. Ruth counters this by arguing that effective writing and understanding of any historical or cultural subject are not constrained by one's personal experience, much like writers today who aren't part of ancient Roman culture can still write competently about it.
Thus, the contention revolves around the qualifications needed to write proficiently about historical music genres. The debate focuses on the direct experience versus learned understanding. The correct representation of the issue, in this case, is whether only those people who were in their teens or early twenties during the 1960s can be qualified to write about the rock music of that period, aligning with option (A).