80.4k views
1 vote
∆'s are liable not only for "direct" contact (battery), but also "indirect" contact—it will be sufficient if she sets in motion a force that brings about harmful or offensive contact to the ∏'s person. True or False

User Ajax
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

True. In tort law, a defendant can be held liable not only for direct contact (battery) but also for indirect contact if they set in motion a force that causes harm or offensive contact to the plaintiff.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is true. In the context of tort law, a direct contact (battery) occurs when there is physical contact between the defendant and the plaintiff. However, an indirect contact can also give rise to liability if the defendant sets in motion a force that brings about harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff's person. This means that the defendant does not need to physically touch the plaintiff directly, but can be held liable for the consequences of their actions.

User DChaplin
by
7.9k points