63.2k views
1 vote
Is this relation a function? If not, explain why.
(-2,-2) (2,-1) (3,0) (5,3) (5,4)

User Sbarow
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Final answer:

The given relation is not a function because the x-value of 5 is associated with two different y-values (3 and 4), failing the vertical line test.

Step-by-step explanation:

The relation given as (-2,-2) (2,-1) (3,0) (5,3) (5,4) is not a function because there are two different y-values for the same x-value (5). In a function, each x-value must correspond to exactly one y-value.

This is known as the vertical line test, where if a vertical line crosses the graph of the relation more than once, then the relation is not a function.

Since the x-value of 5 corresponds to two different y-values (3 and 4), the vertical line test fails, and therefore the relation cannot be classified as a function.

A correct example of a function is a table of points like (1,5), (2,10), (3,7), and (4,14) where each x-value has a single distinct y-value, thus showing the proper dependence of y on x.

User Joseph Wambura
by
8.6k points
1 vote

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

No, the given set of ordered pairs {(-2, -2), (2, -1), (3, 0), (5, 3), (5, 4)} does not represent a function. In a function, each input (x-value) should be associated with only one unique output (y-value). However, in this case, the input value 5 is associated with both y = 3 and y = 4. Therefore, the relation is not a function.

User Ggorlen
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories