52.7k views
5 votes
Is this relation a function? If not, explain why.
(-3,-1) (-2,0) (-1,3) (-1,0) (0,-1)

User Capfer
by
8.1k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

The relation given by the points (-3,-1), (-2,0), (-1,3), (-1,0), (0,-1) is not a function because the x-value -1 maps to two different y-values.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine whether the given set of points defines a function, we need to look at the x-values. By definition, for a set of points to represent a function, each x-value in the domain should map to exactly one y-value. When examining the list of points (-3,-1), (-2,0), (-1,3), (-1,0), (0,-1), we notice that the x-value -1 is associated with two different y-values (3 and 0). This duplication of the x-value with different corresponding y-values violates the definition of a function.

Therefore, the relation is not a function because the x-value -1 is mapped to two different y-values, which fails the vertical line test for functions.

A relation is a function if each input (x-value) is paired with exactly one output (y-value). In this case, the relation (-3,-1) (-2,0) (-1,3) (-1,0) (0,-1) is not a function because the input value -1 is paired with two different output values: 3 and 0. A function cannot have multiple outputs for the same input.

User Andy Webb
by
8.8k points
7 votes

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

No, the given set of ordered pairs {(-3, -1), (-2, 0), (-1, 3), (-1, 0), (0, -1)} does not represent a function. In a function, each input (x-value) should be associated with only one unique output (y-value). However, in this case, the input value -1 is associated with both y = 3 and y = 0. Therefore, the relation is not a function.

User Jason Sherman
by
8.6k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories